Ambulance Service Could Be Cut Off To Rural Benton County

As some Benton County voters get ready to decide whether to fund local ambulance services, emergency crews are warning they could have to cut off some rural areas if the proposed ambulance fee does not pass.

Benton County rural voters are set to decide Feb. 11 whether to pay an $85 annual ambulance fee to fund calls to unincorporated areas. If the vote fails, some cities may stop responding to those areas altogether.

There are seven service providers that provide ambulance services to the unincorporated parts of Benton County. Arkansas state laws say cities can provide services outside of their city limits if there is a contract in place for them to be reimbursed. Over the past three years, the county has paid some money to the cities, but city officials say it’s just not enough to keep the rural service going.

“We can not continue to afford to provide that service in the county without payment,” said Siloam Springs Fire Chief Greg Neely.  “That’s in accordance to state statute.”

Benton County Judge Bob Clinard said the cost for rural ambulance services in Benton County could reach $1.2 million by 2016. Clinard said to reimburse city providers for the availability of ambulance services, households in unincorporated areas will have to pay an annual $85 fee. Clinard said the fee is based on the estimate for 2016.

“That fee should last several years and cover what the cities and providers want to provide,” he said.

About 19,500 unincorporated households will decide whether or not to support the permanent funding mechanism in February.

“If I had the money, I would support it. And if I didn’t have it, I’d try and figure out a way to get it,” Clinard said. “I would want an ambulance to come if someone in my family was to be hurt.”

If the vote fails, Siloam Springs, one of the providers in the county, is prepared to cease EMS services, according to the city.

The Board of Directors passed a resolution to discontinue service to unincorporated parts of Benton County if the reimbursement is not met.

“This is not a bluff,” Neely said. “This is not a threat. We just cannot continue to provide the services for free. We will be breaking the law. We will be breaking the bank, if we continue to do it.”

Clinard said he hopes the situation does not reach that point.

“I don’t make the decisions for those mayors and fire chiefs in the city,” he said. “I hope it gets resolved before they have to decide whether or not they are going to pick somebody up.”

If the vote passes, Clinard said the annual fee would go into effect this year. People would have until Oct. 15 to pay it.

8 comments

  • Joe Delaney

    The county cant keep the roads open in winter, and cant keep ambulance service going, but it can pay $50m for a new courthouse that nobody wants. Nice.

  • Mel Sams

    Being a former Fire Chief I believe someone may want to stop trying to get people to pay for something that the folks are already paying.
    Every Person that pays County Tax and other State Tax’s have already provided the Funding, but for some odd reason the same ones who want a Fee or more Tax are the very ones that end up with Pay Raises and New Vehicles which both should have not happened.
    The County Judge and the Courts need to stop taking and not giving.

  • Jasper

    they never did itemize the cost but only say they don’t have $ to pay for. Stop threating people who HAVE ALREADY PAID share of what they ask for. If they can stop spending $ on something unnecessary and spending money wisely; they will have enough money to pay for it or people will be glad to pay for what they ask. NOT just people out in there might call 911, also could be case of city people ride bike and got hurt; will they need help? Mr. Mayors, you would be better pray that none of your family or friends got hurt in county where you refuse to serve them. It’s about public safety; thus. list the $ and cost/spending and tell people why you don’t have enough $ to pay for it; then we will go with it.

  • joesumone

    19500 x $85= $1,657,500

    $1,657,500 – $1,200,000= $457,500

    Where is the extra money going? Clinard said for rural ambulance service.

    So why not use the following:

    $1,200,000 / 19,500 households = ~$61.54 per household

    Something is smelling a little fishy.

    • joesumone

      “About 19,500 unincorporated households will decide whether or not to support the permanent funding mechanism in February.” – From the above story.

      Either way, the annual tax intake is more than what Clinard stated. It is up to the individual cities to replace/upgrade these vehicles. Yes the tax is paid to the cities so that they can accomplish this. The question remains : Where does the nearly half million dollar overcharge go? What does it pay for? Whose pocket(s) is it going into?

  • Joe Delaney

    The County can build a $50m courthouse and give itself raises but it can’t keep the roads clear and it can’t keep the ambulances running. When you can’t even provide essential services you need to adjust your priorities before you ask the people for more money.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 508 other followers