Former Oklahoma City Officer Convicted Of Sex Crimes Requests New Trial

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – One month after being convicted of sex crimes, a former Oklahoma City police officer is asking for a new trial.

In December, a jury convicted former Oklahoma City police officer Daniel Holtzclaw of 18 counts. 

At his trial, 13 alleged victims testified against Holtzclaw, claiming he took advantage of them while he was on duty.

The jury recommended he be sentenced to 263 years in prison for his crimes.

One day before a judge would officially sentence him, Holtzclaw’s attorney has filed a motion for a new trial.

In the court documents obtained by KFOR, Holtzclaw’s attorney claims his client was denied a fair trial “because the government made deliberate discovery violations and misrepresentations, undermining confidence in the verdict.”

Holtzclaw’s attorney, Scott Adams, says newly discovered evidence was not disclosed to the defense.

Click here to read the court filing.

The court documents claim a Facebook post by a police detective referenced evidence that was “withheld from the defense by the government.”

The post alleges that there was DNA evidence from several of the victims found in Holtzclaw’s car and on his pants.

“The State’s witnesses testified under oath that there was only one individual’s DNA found anywhere during forensic examination of any material – car, pants, or otherwise, and that belonged to victim [A.G.] – found on Mr. Holtzclaw’s pants,” the document claims.

It also alleges that it is possible that not all individuals who made allegations against Holtzclaw were disclosed to the defense.

“If there is additional DNA evidence despite the government’s representations to the contrary, and if there are additional people who came forward and falsely claimed that they were victims- yet for whatever reason their stories were withheld from the defense despite representations under oath that their stories did not exist- then deliberate misrepresentations were made not only to defense counsel but the Court, calling into question the credibility of the government’s entire case,” the document claims. “Such reckless discovery violations and misrepresentations to the court undermine confidence in the fairness of Mr. Holtzclaw’s trial.”