Early Voters Cry Foul After Issue 7 Is Removed From Ballot

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

ARKANSAS (KFSM) -- The Arkansas Supreme Court disqualified Issue 7, also called the Medical Cannabis Act, from the ballot Thursday (Oct. 28).

A petitioner argued paid canvassers who collected signatures to get the measure on the ballot did not meet state guidelines and the Supreme Court agreed.

Voters who already cast their ballots for the general election said they are upset because they voted yes on Issue 7 and no on the other medical marijuana measure on the ballot called Issue 6. They said it is not fair the Supreme Court made its ruling after early voting already started.

John, who requested his last name be left out of the story, said he thought he was doing the right thing by voting early.

“Had [Issue] 6 been my only option then I would've voted yes, but it was not my only option. I had 6 and I had 7. I chose 7 and a lot of other Arkansans that are my friends are also voting yes on 7,” John said.

John said he's a veteran who could benefit from the use of medical marijuana and he preferred Issue 7 over 6 because of the wording.

“It seems like Issue 6, the state has a little more control over it than leaving it in Mr. and Mrs. John Q Public`s hands, which Issue 7 would have." he said. "There were a lot of regulations in [Issue 6] I didn't agree with."

Terah Murphy voted Thursday morning before finding out the court's ruling and like John, said she feels cheated.

"I teach my children how important it is to vote even though you hear all over the place that your vote doesn't count, your vote doesn't count, it's pointless," she said. "I try to drill that into them and then for me to go and vote and think that was pointless?"

Murphy said she would use medical marijuana to ease her fibromyalgia pain.

"I wanted Issue 7. I wanted to have the access to grow my own [plants] and not constantly have to go fill prescriptions like I`m doing now and I just thought it would be better," Murphy said.

Following the Supreme Court's decision, the group backing Issue 7 called Arkansans for Compassionate Care encouraged voters to vote yes on Issue 6 and to continue voting yes on Issue 7 in the event the court's ruling would be overturned on appeal.

Issue 7 will continue appearing on the ballot because ballots are prepared 60 days before the election to accommodate absentee voters whose ballots must be sent out 45 days in advance. Once the ballots are printed they cannot be changed.

Any votes cast for Issue 7 will be saved, but not counted, Chairman of the Benton County Election Commission Russ Anzalone said.

"You can vote for it, but the only thing is we will not tabulate it, we will not share the results. We already have state law dealing with that and we have documentation that we cannot share that information with anyone," he said.

Arkansans for Compassionate Care has five days to request a rehearing.



  • michelinda

    I am 50 years old and this was my first time to vote. I was excited to be part of something and did my homework. I was just penalized for voting early. I studied the issues and was told if 6 and 7 were passed, that the one with the most votes would go into effect. I wanted 7 to be in effect because it covers more medical conditions and made it possible to grow at home with permits. So now my vote is useless – and I can’t go back and vote for 6. It would have been better than nothing. It should be against the law to change the ballot AFTER voting has started. If I had known this, my vote would have been different – I was not INFORMED as a voter. Now as a first time voter I have lost a lot of faith in the system and I will never early vote again.

  • lurker48

    We need a class action law suit to have a re-vote after the election gerrymandering to receive a certain outcome. Trump has one thing and only one thing right “Drain the Swamp”.

  • Libby Beck

    Sounds like Arkansas hasn’t changed much since I left here 14 years ago. This has happened before when the powers that be don’t want something to be on the ballot, much less pass. That judge should be recalled since he/she created this situation.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.