Judge Halts Michigan’s Electoral Recount

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

(CNN)– A federal judge has ordered Michigan’s Board of Elections to stop the state’s electoral recount.

US District Judge Mark Goldsmith issued the order late Wednesday — dissolving a previous temporary restraining order against the Board of Elections that allowed the recount to continue.

Goldsmith’s latest opinion effectively denies Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein’s request to block the Board of Elections from halting the recount.

Stein on Thursday morning called the decision “disheartening.”

“It’s disheartening a judge gave in to Donald Trump and Michigan Republicans, and lifted his emergency order that had kicked off #RecountMI,” she tweeted.

In her motion, Stein had argued against a Tuesday ruling by the State of Michigan Court of Appeals in favor of stopping the recount. That court concluded Stein was not an aggrieved party since she had no reasonable chance of winning by virtue of the recount. In federal court, Stein counter-argued this was a “distorted interpretation” of the law and that it was within her constitutional right to have the recount.

“Rather, Plaintiffs’ asserted right to a recount is just a restatement of her right to participate in a fair election, free from tampering or mistake. But, to date, Plaintiffs have not presented evidence of tampering or mistake. Instead, they present speculative claims going to the vulnerability of the voting machinery — but not actual injury,” read Goldsmith’s order.

In his ruling, Goldsmith declined to adopt the unusual exception applied in Bush v. Gore to disregard a state court’s interpretation.

Goldsmith agreed that the issues Stein raised — fraud and mistakes — were “serious,” but said there was no evidence of such violations.

“A recount as an audit of the election,” Goldsmith concluded, “has never been endorsed by any court.”

Michigan Republican Party Chairman Ronna Romney McDaniel declared the order a victory for voters of Michigan. “The courts have affirmed the stance the campaign has maintained from day one: Jill Stein, who received only 1.07% of the vote in Michigan, is not legally entitled to hijack the will of voters and drag them into an arduous and expensive publicity stunt. Jill Stein’s 1% temper tantrum cost Michigan taxpayers millions of dollars and would have cost them additional millions of dollars if not for the actions of President-elect Trump, the Michigan Republican Party, and Attorney General Bill Schuette.”

Stein has spearheaded a recount effort in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — three battleground states where Donald Trump narrowly defeated Hillary Clinton.

Trump supporters in Wisconsin have unsuccessfully tried to stop the recount in progress there.

Stein’s campaign, who withdrew a recount request in a Pennsylvania state court, filed a lawsuit in federal court Monday morning seeking a statewide recount there.

Stein has raised nearly $7 million to fund the recount efforts, following news that security experts alerted Clinton’s campaign to the possibility of hacks in key counties in those states.

On a Facebook live chat following the Michigan ruling, Stein said “this fight is the right one and it’s only just begun.” She said that her team would be huddling with their attorneys to “figure out the best course forward.”

Stein can file an appeal of the latest ruling with the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“It’s not over yet,” Stein pledged.


  • Benny Hill

    Crooked Hillary’s pawn, Jill “Stain”, is digging a deeper hole for herself. Leftists looking stupid as usual.

  • Randy Ingle

    I can understand the ruling as no evidence of fraud was presented. All of this is nonsense considering none of it would change the fact that Trump won the election. I just wish all the Liberals would accept that fact and pray Trump succeeds for all Americans.

Comments are closed.