FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. — The child pornography trial continues for former reality TV star Josh Duggar.
In April, the 33-year-old was charged with two counts of downloading and possessing child pornography.
According to the Associated Press, a federal Homeland Security agent testified in May that the pornographic images depicting the sexual abuse of children, including toddlers, had been downloaded in May 2019 by a computer at a car dealership that Duggar owned.
Last week, a federal judge decided not to allow phones, laptops or recording devices into the courtroom during the trial.
If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in prison and fines of up to $250,000 on each count.
Dec. 3, 2021
The jury in the case got a unique look at how U.S. Federal forensic analyst James Fotrell analyzed the computer pulled from Duggar’s used car lot.
Duggar's attorneys said that someone else could have downloaded or viewed the child pornography on the computer in question, and the prosecution argued why they believe that is false.
The prosecution focused on details surrounding Duggar's Arvest and Amazon account passwords, saying the passwords used on those accounts matched the one also used to access the child porn found on the computer.
During the cross-examination of Fotrell, the prosecution showed how some of the photos that Duggar took at his used car lot coincided with the times the child porn was downloaded/viewed on the computer also at the same car lot.
The forensic analyst told jurors how Duggar was spotted using the computer in question after his reflection on the computer screen was captured on a photo he allegedly took. In that reflection, the analyst circled a person's silhouette with a hat. The prosecution brought up a photograph that same day where Duggar was wearing a hat with the same logo, leading the analyst to believe it was Duggar.
During the trial, the prosecution noted that Duggar's computer had software downloaded so his wife could track his online activity. The software sends Anna Duggar, Josh Duggar's wife, an accountability report on his internet usage. The prosecution has noted in the past that they believe Duggar used a partitioned hard drive with Linux to get around the software.
Dec. 2, 2021
Jill (Duggar) Dillard's husband, Derick Dillard, walked into court ahead of day two of the trial. Jill, Josh Duggar's sister, could be called to the stand to testify at some point during the trial.
During Wednesday's hearing, the defense called Department of Homeland Security Special Agent Gerald Faulkner to testify. He stated that in May 2019, the FBI Little Rock Office traced materials described as child pornography downloaded through peer-to-peer file sharing torrents to an IP address in Fayetteville.
After an investigation, Homeland Security agents matched the location to a used car lot Duggar owns in Springdale. Later that year, agents searched the property and seized multiple computers and Duggar's personal iPhone. The agent claimed Duggar used a Linux partition on one of the computers at the car lot to get around software that alerted his wife if he viewed pornography.
After analyzing the seized materials, the agent says his team found several files depicting child porn on a computer that Duggar had accessed. He then stated that some of the types of images located on Duggar's computer ranked among the worst he has seen in his career investigating child pornography.
The special agent claimed that before recording his initial interview in 2019, Duggar allegedly said, "What is this about? Did someone download child pornography?"
During day three of the trial, the defense questioned who exactly had access to Duggar's computer at the car dealership.
The defense claimed the special agent's timeline is wrong about when someone allegedly downloaded the child pornography onto Duggar's work computer.
When called to the stand to testify, the special agent claimed a person with access to Duggar's laptop downloaded the images on businesses days between 10-11 p.m. Duggar's attorneys argued that the person downloaded the photos between 4-5 p.m.
Dec. 1, 2021
On Wednesday, Dec. 1, Judge Timothy Brooks rejected a motion filed by Duggar's attorneys that would have prevented evidence of past molestation allegations from being presented in court.
On Wednesday, jurors also saw portions of the images and videos found on the computer confiscated from the car dealership Duggar owned.
Some of those pornographic images depicted children as young as 7-years-old. Duggar's defense claimed he did not download the pictures.
The first day ended with the defense questioning the special agent who issued the search warrant to go inside of Josh Duggar's car dealership, where they confiscated two computers and his cellphone.
Josh Duggar trial in Washington County
Nov. 30, 2021
Jury selection began Tuesday, Nov. 30 morning at the Washington County Courthouse.
Josh Duggar, seen holding the hand of his wife Anna, walked into court in Washington County on Tuesday for the first day of trial.
Although jury selection is underway, the judge has still not decided whether family friend Bobeye Holt will testify against Josh.
The prosecution filed a supplemental brief on Tuesday describing the importance of Bobeye's testimony. In brief, it details Josh Duggar's alleged confession to Holt of molesting four minors in 2003.
According to the brief, Josh Duggar discussed this with Holt because, at that time, he was in a relationship with her daughter. The state says Holt described this as a conversation between close family friends and was not related to anyone's role in the church they both attended.
Josh Duggar's attorneys submitted a supplemental briefing on Tuesday claiming that Holt's testimony falls under clergy privilege, also referred to as priest-penitent/religious privilege. This would shield certain communications from disclosure.
The brief states that Josh Duggar made these alleged statements to Holt with the expectation that they would be kept confidential.
According to the prosecution's brief, Josh Duggar failed to adduce any credible evidence that he received "priestly consolation and guidance" from Holt or that he expected her not to reveal what he said.
In these documents the judge is using to decide if Holt will testify, we have learned what the prosecution says Josh Duggar told her that day.
The following details could be difficult for some to read.
According to the prosecution, on Mar. 30, 2003, the Holts joined Josh Duggar and his parents in his parent's bedroom, where he told Mrs. Holt that he had inappropriately touched the vagina of one of the victim's that day and had been touching the breasts and vaginal areas of three others, both over and under their clothes, for years.
The prosecution's brief states that Holt further testified that in early 2005, the defendant stayed with her and her husband in Little Rock because, as she explained, they "loved him and wanted to see if he could repair his relationship with their daughter." One evening after her husband fell asleep. Holt testified that Josh Duggar told her that he had "digitally penetrated" one of the victim's vaginas while she sat on his lap and he read her Bible stories. According to the document, this rape occurred on Mar. 30, 2003, which prompted the Duggars to contact the Holts that day.
Jury selection from 52 potential jurors has been completed with 12 main jurors and four alternates.
Potential witnesses include Jedidiah Duggar and Jill Duggar-Dillard, siblings to Josh Duggar.
Nov. 29, 2021
On Monday, Josh Duggar was in court for an evidentiary hearing ahead of his child pornography trial. Jury selection is set for Tuesday, Nov. 30.
After the prosecution presented two new witnesses to testify about a past molestation case involving Josh Duggar, the judge called Monday's hearing.
The judge asked for a subpoena for Josh's dad, Jim Bob Duggar, who's currently running for a state senate seat representing Washington County. A family friend named Bobye Holt is also facing a subpoena.
Prosecutors allege Josh Duggar may have confessed to Holt about a previous assault.
During Monday's hearing, the judge did not decide if these two would have to testify during the trial. He did ask for a briefing from both sides on why they should or should not testify. The judge will revisit it before jury selection begins Tuesday.
5NEWS will have full coverage of the trial as it progresses.